RESEARCH PAPER
A comparative study of body posture, lifestyle and physical activity patterns among students of health sciences in Poland, Lithuania, and Portugal
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty of Rehabilitation, University of Physical Culture in Krakow, Poland, Polska
2
Department of Health, Polytechnic Institute of Beja, Portugal
3
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences in Kaunas, Lithuania
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction and objective:
Exercise during study at university improves both academic performance and quality of life. Good physical health, improved self-esteem and social life are all benefits. Students often sit for long periods due to academic activities, studying, and computer use. This can have implications for physical and mental health The aim of this study is to compare how much students in Poland, Lithuania and Portugal understand about the prevention of back pain, body posture, and leisure activities.
Material and methods:
A total of 486 students from Poland, Lithuania and Portugal completed the survey using an online
questionnaire. The survey was addressed to students in a selection of health science degree programmes: Physiotherapy (263), Nursing (134) and Occupational therapy (89). Chi-squared tests and the contingency coefficient were performed to determine whether there were significant differences in the mean scores
of physiotherapy, occupational therapy and nursing students
Results:
The results of the chi-square test, which is statistically associated with the interconnectedness due to viral spread, identified the defect as correct (p = 0.00). The survey shows that 58.14% of respondents experiencing pain were active, while 41.86% described themselves as physically inactive but
suffering from pain. Physiotherapy students spent the most time on activity (58.94%), while nursing students (39.55%) and occupational therapy students (33.71%) spent the least time on activity.
Conclusions:
The importance of education in promoting a healthy lifestyle among university students is both evident
and necessary. The sample comprised only a half of the health science students, which limited generalisations. It is recommended that future research should be conducted on a larger group of people.
REFERENCES (12)
1.
Nowak PF, Bożek A, Blukacz M. Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior, and Quality of Life among University Students. Biomed Res Int. 2019;18;2019:9791281. doi:10.1155/2019/9791281.
2.
Ekelund U, Tarp J, Steene-Johannessen J, Hansen BH, Jefferis B, Fagerland MW, Whincup P, et al. Dose-response associations between accelerometry measured physical activity and sedentary time and all cause mortality: systematic review and harmonised meta-analysis. BMJ. 2019;21;366:l4570. doi:10.1136/bmj.l4570.
3.
Seyedahmadi M, Rostami J, Khalaghi K. The Relationship between Mobile Phone Addiction and Changes in Spinal Column Angles of Male High School Students with Endomorphic Body Type. Int J Prev Med. 2025;28;16:30. doi:10.4103/ijpvm.ijpvm_101_24.
4.
Lewandowski J, Lukaszewska K. Characteristics of back pain in Polish youth depending on place of residence. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2014;21(3):644–8. doi:10.5604/12321966.1120618. PMID: 25292145.
5.
Kędra A, Kolwicz-Gańko A, Kędra P, Bochenek A, Czaprowski D. Back pain in physically inactive students compared to physical education students with a high and average level of physical activity studying in Poland. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;28;18(1):501. doi:10.1186/s12891-017-1858-9. PMID: 29183373; PMCID: PMC5706389.
6.
Zurita-Ortega F, Badicu G, Chacón-Cuberos R, Castro-Sánchez M. Motivational Climate and Physical Activity: A Multigroup Analysis in Romanian and Spanish University Students. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;5;16(11):2013. doi:10.3390/ijerph16112013.
7.
Carballo-Fazanes A, Rico-Díaz J, Barcala-Furelos R, Rey E, Rodríguez-Fernández JE, Varela-Casal C, Abelairas-Gómez C. Physical Activity Habits and Determinants, Sedentary Behaviour and Lifestyle in University Students. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;8;17(9):3272. doi:10.3390/ijerph17093272.
8.
Sáez I, Solabarrieta J, Rubio I. Physical Self-Concept, Gender, and Physical Condition of Bizkaia University Students. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17;17(14):5152. doi:10.3390/ijerph17145152.
9.
Lewandowski J, Szulc P, Boch-Kmieciak J, Bartkowiak P, Paul O. Epidemiology Of Low Back Pain In Students Of Physical Education And Physiotherapy. Education. 2011;6(9):85.
10.
Yan Y, Dong J, Li T. A study of head and shoulder posture and cervical muscle electromyographic characteristics in college students with chronic neck pain: A case-control study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 21;104(47):e45789. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000045789.
11.
Batebi M, Namin BG, Nasermelli MH., Abolhasani M, Fard AHS. The relationship between static and dynamic postural deformities with pain and quality of life in non-athletic women. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024;1;25(1):771. doi:10.1186/s12891-024-07880-6.
12.
Carballo-Fazanes A, Rico-Díaz J, Barcala-Furelos R, Rey E, Rodríguez-Fernández JE, Varela-Casal C, Abelairas-Gómez C. Physical Activity Habits and Determinants, Sedentary Behaviour and Lifestyle in University Students. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;8;17(9):3273. doi:10.3390/ijerph17093272.