PL EN
RESEARCH PAPER
Importance of prophylactic veterinary measures in public health
 
More details
Hide details
1
Zakład Technologii i Oceny Jakości Żywności Katedra Dietetyki, Śląski Uniwersytet Medyczny w Katowicach
 
2
Zakład Promocji Zdrowia Katedry Dietetyki Wydział Zdrowia Publicznego Śląski Uniwersytet Medyczny w Katowicach
 
 
Med Og Nauk Zdr. 2014;20(4):347-350
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Activities within the scope of veterinary treatment are commonly associated with help for animals in the vicinity of man, and free living animals. It is frequently forgotten that veterinary medicine covers also qualified activities in the service of public health. People should be aware that veterinary measures (vaccinations, deworming, protection against insects) are a form of health care not only for animals but also for humans.

Objective:
The objective of the study was an analysis of awareness among dog owners concerning health risks resulting from having a dog at home, and observance of prophylactic veterinary procedures.

Material and Methods:
During the period 1 November 2011–29 February 2012, a survey was conducted which covered 300 dog owners from urban areas. The information collected by means of a questionnaire were subjected to statistical analysis using software Statistica 10. The non-parametric chi-square test was applied (p=0.05) for qualitative characteristics, with V Cramer’s coefficient to assess dependence.

Results:
The results obtained showed that females, more frequently than males, are concerned about the health of their dogs. Nearly 78% of respondents vaccinate their dog against rabies once a year, 61% – deworm their dog at least twice a year, and less than 4/5 of the respondents protect their dog against eco-parasites.

Conclusions:
The study showed that prophylactic veterinary procedures are a generally accepted and common form of zoonoses control; however, despite this fact, there is a need for the constant education of society in order to prevent diseases transmitted by domestic dogs

 
REFERENCES (17)
1.
Kiedlik D, Fal A. Podstawy zdrowia publicznego. W: Felińczak A, Fal A (red.). Zdrowie publiczne. Wrocław: Akademia Medyczna im. Piastów Śląskich; 2010: 9–11.
 
2.
Opolski J. Zdrowie publiczne. Wybrane zagadnienia, t. 1. Warszawa: Szkoła Zdrowia Publicznego CMPK; 2011.
 
3.
Macpherson C, Meslin F, Wandeler A. Dog, Zoonoses and Public Health. New York: CABI Publishing; 2000.
 
4.
Reader’s Digest Eurodata – a Consumer Survey of 17 European Countries, Reader’s Digest Association, London, 1991.
 
5.
2011–2012 National Pet Owners Survey. American Pet Products Association, Greenwich, 2011.
 
6.
 
7.
WHO Technical Report Series: WHO expert consultation on rabies. Geneva: WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data; 2004.
 
8.
Kłapeć T, Cholewa A. Zagrożenia dla zdrowia związane ze stosowaniem nawozów organicznych i organiczno-mineralnych. Medycyna Ogólna i Nauki o Zdrowiu, 2012; 18(2): 131–136.
 
9.
Lis H, Górski K. Ocena sytuacji epizootiologicznej wścieklizny na terenie Europy w 2011 r. Życie Weterynaryjne, 2013; 88(4): 309–312.
 
10.
 
11.
Narodowy Instytut Zdrowia Publicznego: Państwowy Zakład Higieny, Zakład Epidemiologii, Pracownia Monitorowania i Analizy Sytuacji Epidemiologicznej, Meldunki roczne, na: http://www.pzh.gov.pl/ oldpage/epimeld/index_p.html (dostęp: 2011.05.01).
 
12.
Mrożek-Budzyn D. Wakcynologia praktyczna. α-medica press, Kraków; 2009.
 
13.
Ustawa z dn. 11. marca 2004 r. o ochronie zdrowia zwierząt oraz zwalczaniu chorób zakaźnych zwierząt (Dz. U. 2004 Nr 69 poz. 625).
 
14.
 
15.
Frymus T. Choroby zakaźne psów. Warszawa: Si-ma; 1999.
 
16.
Maciołek H. Epidemiologia chorób odzwierzęcych w zarysie. Akademia Świętokrzyska im. Jana Kochanowskiego w Kielcach, Piotrków Trybunalski, 2001.
 
17.
Blagburn B. Tapeworm – overlooked, underdiagnosed and undertreated. Alabama: Virbac Animal Health; 2006.
 
eISSN:2084-4905
ISSN:2083-4543
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top